From Jorg's site:
QUOTE
Update: So I had a talk with Bill Stromberg, president of AIDA International. And he confirmed my idea of what happened. June 14th was the real deal, and June 16th was the show dive for the media. This way freediving was marketed the best way possible without any possible ugly stuff videotaped or anything. The funny thing is that on the ‘’show” dive there were 3 Greek AIDA judges on site as spectators and they did not see that it was not the real dive. And they even didn’t see that Herbert didn’t do his surface protocol the right way. Of course delaying announcements of new world records can only be done with record attempts and not with competitions. And it’s in the best of AIDA and all the freedivers that the media is happy with us, so in my opinion this is totally acceptable, as long as afterwards everything is honestly told to the hardcore freediving community.
UNQUOTE
So the story NOW is that the 214m dive actually took place BOTH on Thursday and on Saturday... I am sorry but in my humble opinion it is not very likely that the "show" dive was to 214m because:
1. Why put Herbert in additional danger for no reason when a 50m hang would be sufficient. (the team was already worried about the danger in each and every deep dive to allow an extra 214m dive when it was not really necessary ... or not?)
2. The organiser's didn't allow anyone in the water on Saturday apart from their divers - no matter how far from the dive platform we said we were going to be...with the additional info it sounds to me that they didn't want anyone in the water seeing what was going on...
3. If you are going to go to 214m on Saturday anyway why do it two days before too?
So I have to conclude that the Saturday dive was just a "shallow show dive" - anything else would not follow common sense...
I have to say that this deeply saddens me - is this what we want for freediving? To present stunts for the media instead of the real thing? Is this going to give our sport the media attention we want when it leaks to the media that what they were invited to attend was a hoax and not the real deal? Does it give credibility to AIDA when the judges are part of such an attempt were the media is being misled (keep in mind that the media was invited to witness a record dive being made according to AIDA rules)? On top of that the freediving community was misled with "live" coverage of "the WR dive" etc (which I guess is a minor thing)...
As far as the Greek AIDA judges - there were two judges present (a third one was actually part of the organising team so I guess he knew what was going on) ...none of the judges (I am not a judge by the way) were allowed in the water and none were timing the dive to the second...we had watches but there was time given by the official judges during the dive so we accepted that - so we all actually accepted that what we were witnessing was a WR dive going well and not an attempt by the organisers to mislead us...furthermore Herbert did a surface protocol when he surfaced coached by Markus which might have had some tiny flaws (I think the ok sign was not given directly to a judge but cannot be sure, the 30sec period after completion of the protocol seemed a bit fast and there was no white card given at any stage which seemed strange...) but all in all nothing really unacceptable
QUOTE
So, they pulled a big one on us, but it’s understandable with all this media pressure and sponsorship these days, that failure is not an option. Now everybody must be convinced that it wasn’t a lucky shot! Two times in 3 days to 214 meters for Herbert… wow!
UNQUOTE
Sorry Jorg but what sponsorship and what media pressure are you referring to? The event sponsor was Alki who also took part in organising the event...(so its not a distant sponsor demanding results but one that is involved in the day to day goings on of the event)...and media??? come on !!! did you see any news about this anywhere? On Saturday there was only one TV camera (no reporter) from a local TV station and about a dozen people with their compact digicams hanging from the side of the media boat...is this the media pressure that would stress the athlete??? COME ON!!
I have to say that I am deeply saddened by the trend that is developing during the last WR events to mislead people and press about what is really going on - I think this can cause significant damage to the image AIDA has as a credible governing body for the sport of freediving, when the press gets the information that the records they are invited to attend actually took place a few days before...
Stavros