Hey Tyler,
Tofino surfing, here we come!
I second your thought about everyone having a host of different variables that they must explore for themselves.
However, perhaps I need to define something more clearly in relation to what you said here:
Remember Pete and Eric are referring to a very different warm-up procedure as opposed to a very different breath-up. Therefore they are still ventilating significant amounts of CO2. And if you refer back to the study Jason refers to, then you also find that the study found that freedivers ventilate CO2 more effectively than untrained persons. Which suggests what seems like a breath-up that should not significantly ventilate CO2, could very well be doing that.
To me, the term "ventilating C02" implies getting rid of CO2 that would normally be present in the blood at the resting state ("resting state" being the ideal state to be in for static apnea). This is equivalent to hyperventilation in my mind, because the effect is the same and the difference is in degree and in semantics (especially among freedivers).
When I prepare for the first "no-breathe up" static I breathe normally. Am I ventilating CO2? No, not if we agree that ventilating CO2 takes some additional effort and results in a lowering of carbonic acid in the blood. My goal in not doing a warm-up is to start the static with a "normal" level of blood pH, buffers and acids and whatever else exists in there. This normal state will of course vary from day to day.
Your point that ventilations can be equivalent whether you hyperventilate like a madman for 2 minutes, or do slow pursed-lip breathing twice a minute for ten minutes is also good. But I "feel" that with the subneutral breathing that I do, I could do it for infinity and still not "ventilate C02." (relative to unconscious breathing at rest).
So in my "warm-up" (which is different from Eric's, it turns out), I believe I am not "ventilating significant amounts of CO2." On the contrary, I believe my preparation seeks a homeostatis of a great many variables.
Jason,
Taking the last breath is energy intensive compared to 5-10 minutes of sub-neutral breathing. But consider that your static begins when you take that deep breath and begin packing, not when you finish packing. And yes, inhaling less and packing the rest probably saves energy. Also, packing speed and volume for each pack can be improved be technique to make it more energy efficient.
I also find (like Panos) that over a week of doing intense statics, my lungs stretch out and I can pack more without tension in the diaphragm. I think this is an important factor in getting longer times: being able to inhale larger volumes of air and pack more in without feeling like you are going to burst.
During training, I pack as much as I can handle, because of the stretch. My last pack goes into my cheeks and I judge the percent of max packing by the time when I can push the air in my cheeks into my lungs. On a very full pack, the air might only go in at 4 or 5 minutes. If the contractions start before I am able to put the air into my lungs, I might release one or two mouth fills of air into the water to relieve the considerable pressure. Eric and I both find resisting and relaxing during contractions easier with less volume in the lungs.
In competition, assuming several days of training with full packing as described above, I would pack to what feels most comfortable, but full. Very subjective, I know.
I think we're going to the pool tonight, I let you know how it goes.
Pete Scott
Vancouver, BC